Not satisfied with underhandedly ramming unconstitutional ObamaCare through Congress under the cover of darkness without an official vote, Barack Hussein Obama just bestowed amnesty on millions of illegal aliens! Not by representative legislation, as required by the U.S. Constitution: Amnesty by dictate, like a third-world tyrant!
Forget Congress! Never mind the will of the people! Throw the U.S. Constitution out the White House window!
The megalomaniac in the Oval Office spoke amnesty into reality by merely telling his subordinates to announce they no longer are going to enforce America's immigration laws.
Arrogantly elevating himself shockingly far above the law, 0 is quickly transforming the United States of America into a socialist state by hook AND crook. And few Americans have an inkling of just how tyrannical 0's clandestine deceit has become since last November's election significantly diminished his Congressional power.
This would-be dictator now brazenly rules by fiat, through official and unofficial Executive Orders and Secretarial Orders, as if personally feeding the U.S. Constitution -- article by article, amendment by amendment -- into a document shredder. He is a frighteningly dangerous despot-in-the-making who must be stopped!
0 brazenly confessed to a meeting of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus how he recently told Hispanic group La Raza that when it comes to illegal immigration, "There are times where -- until Nancy Pelosi is speaker again -- I'd like to work my way around Congress. ... I wish I had a magic wand and could make this all happen on my own."
Well -- POOF!!! -- that's precisely what he did! Bypassing the U.S. Senate and U.S. House, as well as the U.S. Constitution, he personally proclaimed amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.
At the time, 0 bragged about his underhanded scheme: "We've got laws on the books that have to be upheld. ... How we enforce the laws is also important," he said, slyly alluding to his major change of ordering a halt to immigration law enforcement.
So, Barack, how do you bestow amnesty? Simple. You, as would-be dictator-in-chief, merely order your regime not to initiate deportation proceedings against illegal immigrants. Period.
Thus 0 indeed worked his way around Congress. And -- so far -- nobody is doing anything about it!
Wednesday, September 28
Thursday, March 3
Ask national media traitors: What if Bush did it?
I saw this at www.TeaPartyNation.com and it rings true! In a letter to the national media traitor of your choice, or your local newspaper editor for that matter, ask the following:
If George W. Bush had doubled the national debt -- which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate -- in one year, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had criticized a state law that he admitted he never even read, would you think that he is just an ignorant hot head?
If George W. Bush joined the country of Mexico and sued a state in the United States to force that state to continue to allow illegal immigration, would you question his patriotism and wonder who's side he was on?
If George W. Bush had pronounced the Marine Corps like Marine Corpse would you think him an idiot?
If George W. Bush had put 87,000 workers out of work by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on offshore oil drilling on companies that have one of the best safety records of any industry because one company had an accident would you have agreed?
If George W. Bush had used a forged document as the basis of the moratorium that would render 87,000 American workers unemployed would you support him?
If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a TelePrompTer installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?
If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM stock by 90percent and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?
If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia , would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?
If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had stated that there were 57 states in the United States, would you have said that he is clueless.
If George W. Bush would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him walking out his front door in Texas, would you have thought he was a self-important, conceited, egotistical jerk?
If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?
If George W. Bush had misspelled the word "advice" would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoes as proof of what a dunce he is?
If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he's a hypocrite?
If George W. Bush's administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?
If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?
If George W. Bush had created the position of 32 Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in America, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?
So, please tell me what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in 21 months -- so you'll have two years and two months to come up with an answer.
If after sending this letter you get a coherant reply, please return to "Get It Right!" and post it in a comment. By the way, let the editor know that every statement is factual and directly attributable to Mr. 0. Every bumble is a matter of record and completely verifiable.
If George W. Bush had doubled the national debt -- which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate -- in one year, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had criticized a state law that he admitted he never even read, would you think that he is just an ignorant hot head?
If George W. Bush joined the country of Mexico and sued a state in the United States to force that state to continue to allow illegal immigration, would you question his patriotism and wonder who's side he was on?
If George W. Bush had pronounced the Marine Corps like Marine Corpse would you think him an idiot?
If George W. Bush had put 87,000 workers out of work by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on offshore oil drilling on companies that have one of the best safety records of any industry because one company had an accident would you have agreed?
If George W. Bush had used a forged document as the basis of the moratorium that would render 87,000 American workers unemployed would you support him?
If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a TelePrompTer installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?
If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM stock by 90percent and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?
If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia , would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?
If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had stated that there were 57 states in the United States, would you have said that he is clueless.
If George W. Bush would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him walking out his front door in Texas, would you have thought he was a self-important, conceited, egotistical jerk?
If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?
If George W. Bush had misspelled the word "advice" would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoes as proof of what a dunce he is?
If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he's a hypocrite?
If George W. Bush's administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?
If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?
If George W. Bush had created the position of 32 Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in America, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?
So, please tell me what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in 21 months -- so you'll have two years and two months to come up with an answer.
If after sending this letter you get a coherant reply, please return to "Get It Right!" and post it in a comment. By the way, let the editor know that every statement is factual and directly attributable to Mr. 0. Every bumble is a matter of record and completely verifiable.
Friday, February 25
Obama + Constitution = 0, zero, nothing, nada
Some ask why I call Barack Hussein Obama "Mr. 0" in this blog. First, it's not O, the uppercase of o. It's 0 as in the number that follows 9 on your keyboard.
Which then raises the question: "Why are you calling him 'Mr. Zero?'"
Several reasons. First of all, I just don't like typing (or hearing or speaking or seeing or thinking, etc.) his name. And I've lived long enough to remember America's arch enemy Nikita Kruschev. You know, that bullet-headed meanie who pounded his shoe at the U.N. and promised America "We will bury you!" I wasn't the only one then who didn't like his name, and America pretty much called the Soviet dictator "Mr. K."
And I'd rather use "Mr. 0" than other longer synonyms, like "treasonous tyrant" or "Marxist dictator" or, well, you get the idea.
But the real reason is this: When America finally realizes Mr. 0 isn't constitutionally qualified to be the President of the United States, everything this treasonous tyrant (oops!) committed in the Oval Office will be reduced to zero! And that thought makes me smile.
I look forward to that day. Somehow, though, even if Mr. 0 doesn't produce an authentic forgery of his missing long-form birth certificate, needed for him to be declared a natural born citizen and have the p in president properly capitalized (note that many break style rules and don't capitalize for this very reason), the Dems and their media lackeys will find it in their heart to overlook this premeditated fraud. After all, they'll say, he didn't know of the U.S. Constitution's qualifications, even though his resume says Mr. 0 is a Constitutional scholar. They'll ask us if everything on OUR resumes is truthful, and we'll look sheepish.
And then, after the race card, they'll play their trump card: "To err is human; to forgive, divine." They'll ask all us bitter Bible-huggers to do what's right and turn the other cheek -- and let Mr. 0 ruin the land we love for another four years.
That'll come with a satisfaction guarantee like that of the trashmen in the cartoon stripe "Hi and Lois." Visible in the grime on their filthy truck are the words Dems live by: "Your satisfaction guaranteed -- or double your trash back!"
And I wonder how many of us right-minded Americans will want to wade through the blood and carnage necessary to successfully oust Mr. 0 as the usurper he in truth is.
Which then raises the question: "Why are you calling him 'Mr. Zero?'"
Several reasons. First of all, I just don't like typing (or hearing or speaking or seeing or thinking, etc.) his name. And I've lived long enough to remember America's arch enemy Nikita Kruschev. You know, that bullet-headed meanie who pounded his shoe at the U.N. and promised America "We will bury you!" I wasn't the only one then who didn't like his name, and America pretty much called the Soviet dictator "Mr. K."
And I'd rather use "Mr. 0" than other longer synonyms, like "treasonous tyrant" or "Marxist dictator" or, well, you get the idea.
But the real reason is this: When America finally realizes Mr. 0 isn't constitutionally qualified to be the President of the United States, everything this treasonous tyrant (oops!) committed in the Oval Office will be reduced to zero! And that thought makes me smile.
I look forward to that day. Somehow, though, even if Mr. 0 doesn't produce an authentic forgery of his missing long-form birth certificate, needed for him to be declared a natural born citizen and have the p in president properly capitalized (note that many break style rules and don't capitalize for this very reason), the Dems and their media lackeys will find it in their heart to overlook this premeditated fraud. After all, they'll say, he didn't know of the U.S. Constitution's qualifications, even though his resume says Mr. 0 is a Constitutional scholar. They'll ask us if everything on OUR resumes is truthful, and we'll look sheepish.
And then, after the race card, they'll play their trump card: "To err is human; to forgive, divine." They'll ask all us bitter Bible-huggers to do what's right and turn the other cheek -- and let Mr. 0 ruin the land we love for another four years.
That'll come with a satisfaction guarantee like that of the trashmen in the cartoon stripe "Hi and Lois." Visible in the grime on their filthy truck are the words Dems live by: "Your satisfaction guaranteed -- or double your trash back!"
And I wonder how many of us right-minded Americans will want to wade through the blood and carnage necessary to successfully oust Mr. 0 as the usurper he in truth is.
Thursday, February 24
Brrr and grrr! Global warming caused my flat tire
If it wasn't for the premeditated harm being perpetrated on the U.S., the "sky is falling" crowd would be downright laughable, what with Algore busy blaming global warming for spawning that monstrous snowstorm that recently buried much of America.
Ernest Istook, a former Republican congressman from Oklahoma, poked fun at Al, writing in Politico: “If you lose your job, blame global warming. If your boyfriend bugs out, blame global warming. If your kids set the house on fire, blame global warming. If the cashier gives you the wrong change, blame global warming.”
Then Istook turned serious: “It’s nothing new for Al Gore to claim that global warming (or should we call it global cremation?) is causing cold weather instead of hot. He already admitted that he was wrong to tout ethanol, but did it for political purposes. His latest comments are just as consistent.”
Conservatives in the U.S. House aren't laughing. They decided to do something about it last Thursday, approving an amendment to a government-spending bill that would block funding for the Obama administration’s so-called "czars.” You know, Mr. 0's hand-picked advisers who answer neither to Congress nor the American people, only to the dictator in chief. The amendment specifically targets the “climate czar” by blocking funding for energy and climate change. The move would unfund the czars through the end of the fiscal year.
Said Rep. Steve Scalise, who authored the amendment: "I think this sends a strong signal to the president that we are tired of him running this shadow government, where they have got these czars that are literally circumventing the accountability and scrutiny that goes with Senate confirmation. We are going to save millions of taxpayer dollars, but we are also going to send him a signal that he is going to have to hold his administration accountable to the same transparency that he promised, but has unfortunately failed to deliver," Scalise said.
Not letting his miserable track record with Congress get him down, the plucky Mr. 0 is using his regime's agencies and the Clean Air Act to push through his global warming agenda anyway. In fact, the new year began with new carbon limits, and the Environmental Protection Agency is drawing up regulations that require companies to get permits to release greenhouse gases.
After all, who needs Congress, or the support of the American people for that matter, when you're a tyrannical dictator, right?
By the way, American Enterprise Institute scientist Ken Green recently told Fox Mr. 0's new regulations are "job killers," that "any kind of regulation is a weight on economy." ... "It requires people to comply with the law, which takes work hours and time, which reduces the profitability of firms. Therefore, they grow more slowly, and you create less jobs."
Mr. 0, of course, is pleased: It's a lose-lose situation for capitalism that has communists everywhere applauding him.
The Scalise amendment, which must clear the Dem-controlled Senate, would also prohibit funding for the director of the White House Office of Health Reform; the State Department’s special envoy for climate change; the special adviser for green jobs, enterprise and innovation at the Council on Environmental Quality; the senior adviser to the secretary of the treasury assigned to the Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry and senior counselor for manufacturing policy; the White House director of urban affairs; the special envoy to oversee the closure of Guantanamo Bay; the special master for TARP executive compensation at the Department of the Treasury; and the associate general counsel and chief diversity officer at the Federal Communications Commission.
So you might want to thank Rep. Scalise while urging your U.S. Senators to follow suit. Get their contact info through the U.S. Capital Switchboard at (202) 224-3121.
Ernest Istook, a former Republican congressman from Oklahoma, poked fun at Al, writing in Politico: “If you lose your job, blame global warming. If your boyfriend bugs out, blame global warming. If your kids set the house on fire, blame global warming. If the cashier gives you the wrong change, blame global warming.”
Then Istook turned serious: “It’s nothing new for Al Gore to claim that global warming (or should we call it global cremation?) is causing cold weather instead of hot. He already admitted that he was wrong to tout ethanol, but did it for political purposes. His latest comments are just as consistent.”
Conservatives in the U.S. House aren't laughing. They decided to do something about it last Thursday, approving an amendment to a government-spending bill that would block funding for the Obama administration’s so-called "czars.” You know, Mr. 0's hand-picked advisers who answer neither to Congress nor the American people, only to the dictator in chief. The amendment specifically targets the “climate czar” by blocking funding for energy and climate change. The move would unfund the czars through the end of the fiscal year.
Said Rep. Steve Scalise, who authored the amendment: "I think this sends a strong signal to the president that we are tired of him running this shadow government, where they have got these czars that are literally circumventing the accountability and scrutiny that goes with Senate confirmation. We are going to save millions of taxpayer dollars, but we are also going to send him a signal that he is going to have to hold his administration accountable to the same transparency that he promised, but has unfortunately failed to deliver," Scalise said.
Not letting his miserable track record with Congress get him down, the plucky Mr. 0 is using his regime's agencies and the Clean Air Act to push through his global warming agenda anyway. In fact, the new year began with new carbon limits, and the Environmental Protection Agency is drawing up regulations that require companies to get permits to release greenhouse gases.
After all, who needs Congress, or the support of the American people for that matter, when you're a tyrannical dictator, right?
By the way, American Enterprise Institute scientist Ken Green recently told Fox Mr. 0's new regulations are "job killers," that "any kind of regulation is a weight on economy." ... "It requires people to comply with the law, which takes work hours and time, which reduces the profitability of firms. Therefore, they grow more slowly, and you create less jobs."
Mr. 0, of course, is pleased: It's a lose-lose situation for capitalism that has communists everywhere applauding him.
The Scalise amendment, which must clear the Dem-controlled Senate, would also prohibit funding for the director of the White House Office of Health Reform; the State Department’s special envoy for climate change; the special adviser for green jobs, enterprise and innovation at the Council on Environmental Quality; the senior adviser to the secretary of the treasury assigned to the Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry and senior counselor for manufacturing policy; the White House director of urban affairs; the special envoy to oversee the closure of Guantanamo Bay; the special master for TARP executive compensation at the Department of the Treasury; and the associate general counsel and chief diversity officer at the Federal Communications Commission.
So you might want to thank Rep. Scalise while urging your U.S. Senators to follow suit. Get their contact info through the U.S. Capital Switchboard at (202) 224-3121.
Tuesday, February 22
Astonishing number of citizens not buying 0's story
"Politico's" spin on a recent poll brings to mind that old joke about how Soviet mouthpiece "Pravda" reported a two-man footrace: "Russian 2nd, American next to last"?
Straight up, the new poll shows only three in 10 Republicans believe Barack Hussein Obama was born in the United States! That's astounding, considering the media blackout on the issue. But blatantly biased "Politico" reported it this way: "A 51 percent majority of national GOP primary voters erroneously think President Obama was not born in the U.S.; 28 percent know that he was."
Of course, "Politico" had no choice. It would just be too alarming to Dems to honestly report that Public Policy Polling, a left-leaning firm at that, found only 28 percent of Republicans surveyed believe Obama was born in the U.S., while 51 percent do not and another 21 percent say they aren't sure.
You see, the donkeys just knew the "birther" issue would have dried up and blown away by now.
MSNBC "Hardball" host Chris Matthews is among those perplexed by the stunning poll that underscores the growing tide of those questioning Mr. 0's eligibility to rightly continue to serve as President. Especially after Mr. 0 spent more than $1.6 million on hiding all of his records from we the people.
But isn't it hard to believe their surprise is real, not feined? After all, one poll after another since Mr. 0 took office have shown Americans are increasingly skeptical over the supposed story of his birth. In fact, a World Net Daily/Wenzel poll last May revealed 55 percent of Americans -- not just Republicans -- wanted him to release all records relating to his childhood and his education, including "college records, Harvard Law School papers, passport records, travel records, and other similar documentation."
If shocked today, Dems should have gone off like sklyrockets over the fact that, when asked last May what should be done if Mr. 0 is found to be constitutionally unqualified to be President, the poll revealed "59 percent said he should be removed from office, and 35 percent said all bills signed into law by Obama should be repealed. Those numbers have only mushroomed since then.
So spin it or ignore it all they want, this latest poll proves Mr. 0's stonewalling by refusing to answer questions or release ordinary background documentation -- let alone his extraordinary legal maneuvering to keep his background hidden -- is daily eroding America's confidence in him being constitutionally qualified to continue to serve as President. Think of it: Every other President's personal records are open to the public. That Mr. 0 refused to honor his oath of office to defend and uphold the U.S. Constitution is a dead giveaway.
The Constitution requires a President to be a "natural-born citizen," which is not the same as a "citizen." And Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies rightly warns: "Simply put, this question about Obama's legitimacy as president is undermining everything he does in the minds of millions of Americans."
As Dean Debnam, president of the pro-Dem PPP firm put it: "Any thought that the birther theory has been put to rest can be thrown out the window."
Straight up, the new poll shows only three in 10 Republicans believe Barack Hussein Obama was born in the United States! That's astounding, considering the media blackout on the issue. But blatantly biased "Politico" reported it this way: "A 51 percent majority of national GOP primary voters erroneously think President Obama was not born in the U.S.; 28 percent know that he was."
Of course, "Politico" had no choice. It would just be too alarming to Dems to honestly report that Public Policy Polling, a left-leaning firm at that, found only 28 percent of Republicans surveyed believe Obama was born in the U.S., while 51 percent do not and another 21 percent say they aren't sure.
You see, the donkeys just knew the "birther" issue would have dried up and blown away by now.
MSNBC "Hardball" host Chris Matthews is among those perplexed by the stunning poll that underscores the growing tide of those questioning Mr. 0's eligibility to rightly continue to serve as President. Especially after Mr. 0 spent more than $1.6 million on hiding all of his records from we the people.
But isn't it hard to believe their surprise is real, not feined? After all, one poll after another since Mr. 0 took office have shown Americans are increasingly skeptical over the supposed story of his birth. In fact, a World Net Daily/Wenzel poll last May revealed 55 percent of Americans -- not just Republicans -- wanted him to release all records relating to his childhood and his education, including "college records, Harvard Law School papers, passport records, travel records, and other similar documentation."
If shocked today, Dems should have gone off like sklyrockets over the fact that, when asked last May what should be done if Mr. 0 is found to be constitutionally unqualified to be President, the poll revealed "59 percent said he should be removed from office, and 35 percent said all bills signed into law by Obama should be repealed. Those numbers have only mushroomed since then.
So spin it or ignore it all they want, this latest poll proves Mr. 0's stonewalling by refusing to answer questions or release ordinary background documentation -- let alone his extraordinary legal maneuvering to keep his background hidden -- is daily eroding America's confidence in him being constitutionally qualified to continue to serve as President. Think of it: Every other President's personal records are open to the public. That Mr. 0 refused to honor his oath of office to defend and uphold the U.S. Constitution is a dead giveaway.
The Constitution requires a President to be a "natural-born citizen," which is not the same as a "citizen." And Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies rightly warns: "Simply put, this question about Obama's legitimacy as president is undermining everything he does in the minds of millions of Americans."
As Dean Debnam, president of the pro-Dem PPP firm put it: "Any thought that the birther theory has been put to rest can be thrown out the window."
Monday, February 21
"McCarthyism" to fight home-grown killers
Al-Qaida now is actively recruiting home-grown killers within United States borders! That's the extremely ominous warning from Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King, who has set hearings in the U.S. House on the radicalization of American Muslims.
Because of increased security, it's "extremely difficult for them to attack us from outside," Rep. King said. So al-Qaida has switched to recruiting within U.S. borders! "They're taking people who are under the radar screen, who are not on any terrorist surveillance list at all, and they are recruiting them to fight against America," he said.
So how do you suppose they're going about it? Would they approach infidels -- such as Christians or Jews or even atheist liberals -- or seek out Muslims? Would al-Qaida buttonhole people on the street or, say, mosey up in a mosque?
Certainly mosques, where America's Muslims worship and socialize, would be a happy hunting ground.
And the most promising mosque? Why, the one about to be built at Ground Zero in New York City, so that its shadow daily will fall across the site of Islam's triumphant 9/11 strike. Yes, the one that's still scheduled despite the overwhelming objections of the American people. Maybe that's why our protests and petitions are being ignored, huh?
Mr. 0 naturally has been slow to acknowledge the urgency of the terror threat and take a hard line, Rep. King said, noting "it's sort of a schizophrenic administration."
"Schizophrenic." Rep. King said it; not me! Like in some government officials being against terrorism; others, pro?
Rep. King chided Mr. 0 for not being firm enough about the violent protests in Iran. "With Egypt, he was quick to pull the rug on President Hosni Mubarak," he said. "Yet with Iran, when the Iranians were so brutal to the demonstrators, putting down those demonstrations in 2009, the president was virtually silent."
What's more, a new Pentagon-funded study confirms al-Qaida is using the Internet, including Facebook and YouTube, to recruit potential new members right there in their U.S. homes. Poster boy for the home-grown terrorist theory, of course, is Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, an American-born Muslim who killed 13 in a 2009 shooting spree at Fort Hood.
As you might expect, Islamic leaders quickly expressed deep concern that King's hearings will be a witch hunt reminiscent of those by anti-communist crusader Sen. Joe McCarthy in the 1950s. And The New York Times (who else?) criticized the plan.
By the way, thanks to Sen. McCarthy, a massive communist infiltration of our government and society was exposed, narrowly averting a takeover. Bitter that the coup was foiled, sympathizers long have vilified the senator so that his name has become a dirty word -- "McCarthyism" -- to be invoked any time bad guys need to stop Congress from getting to the bottom of some treasonous plot. Like now. But recently released KGB records show the communist ploy was about to work, fully exonerating Joe. You can Google it up. Like the words rainbow and gay, the name McCarthy deserves to be redeemed, but I digress.
Rep. King's Homeland Security Committee hearings are legitimate because: "We have to find out who is being radicalized, how are they attempting to do it, how are they recruiting within the Muslim community and whether or not Muslim leaders are cooperating with law enforcement, what Muslim leaders are doing to find out who in their midst is being recruited and who is a potential danger to the United States," he said.
And isn't it alarmingly sad that right-minded Americans must overcome traitorous opposition and turncoat media to schedule such fact-finding hearings in order to expose this obvious threat. But what else would you expect from an administration run by an Islamist sympathizer whose middle name is Hussein?
Because of increased security, it's "extremely difficult for them to attack us from outside," Rep. King said. So al-Qaida has switched to recruiting within U.S. borders! "They're taking people who are under the radar screen, who are not on any terrorist surveillance list at all, and they are recruiting them to fight against America," he said.
So how do you suppose they're going about it? Would they approach infidels -- such as Christians or Jews or even atheist liberals -- or seek out Muslims? Would al-Qaida buttonhole people on the street or, say, mosey up in a mosque?
Certainly mosques, where America's Muslims worship and socialize, would be a happy hunting ground.
And the most promising mosque? Why, the one about to be built at Ground Zero in New York City, so that its shadow daily will fall across the site of Islam's triumphant 9/11 strike. Yes, the one that's still scheduled despite the overwhelming objections of the American people. Maybe that's why our protests and petitions are being ignored, huh?
Mr. 0 naturally has been slow to acknowledge the urgency of the terror threat and take a hard line, Rep. King said, noting "it's sort of a schizophrenic administration."
"Schizophrenic." Rep. King said it; not me! Like in some government officials being against terrorism; others, pro?
Rep. King chided Mr. 0 for not being firm enough about the violent protests in Iran. "With Egypt, he was quick to pull the rug on President Hosni Mubarak," he said. "Yet with Iran, when the Iranians were so brutal to the demonstrators, putting down those demonstrations in 2009, the president was virtually silent."
What's more, a new Pentagon-funded study confirms al-Qaida is using the Internet, including Facebook and YouTube, to recruit potential new members right there in their U.S. homes. Poster boy for the home-grown terrorist theory, of course, is Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, an American-born Muslim who killed 13 in a 2009 shooting spree at Fort Hood.
As you might expect, Islamic leaders quickly expressed deep concern that King's hearings will be a witch hunt reminiscent of those by anti-communist crusader Sen. Joe McCarthy in the 1950s. And The New York Times (who else?) criticized the plan.
By the way, thanks to Sen. McCarthy, a massive communist infiltration of our government and society was exposed, narrowly averting a takeover. Bitter that the coup was foiled, sympathizers long have vilified the senator so that his name has become a dirty word -- "McCarthyism" -- to be invoked any time bad guys need to stop Congress from getting to the bottom of some treasonous plot. Like now. But recently released KGB records show the communist ploy was about to work, fully exonerating Joe. You can Google it up. Like the words rainbow and gay, the name McCarthy deserves to be redeemed, but I digress.
Rep. King's Homeland Security Committee hearings are legitimate because: "We have to find out who is being radicalized, how are they attempting to do it, how are they recruiting within the Muslim community and whether or not Muslim leaders are cooperating with law enforcement, what Muslim leaders are doing to find out who in their midst is being recruited and who is a potential danger to the United States," he said.
And isn't it alarmingly sad that right-minded Americans must overcome traitorous opposition and turncoat media to schedule such fact-finding hearings in order to expose this obvious threat. But what else would you expect from an administration run by an Islamist sympathizer whose middle name is Hussein?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
