Not satisfied with underhandedly ramming unconstitutional ObamaCare through Congress under the cover of darkness without an official vote, Barack Hussein Obama just bestowed amnesty on millions of illegal aliens! Not by representative legislation, as required by the U.S. Constitution: Amnesty by dictate, like a third-world tyrant!
Forget Congress! Never mind the will of the people! Throw the U.S. Constitution out the White House window!
The megalomaniac in the Oval Office spoke amnesty into reality by merely telling his subordinates to announce they no longer are going to enforce America's immigration laws.
Arrogantly elevating himself shockingly far above the law, 0 is quickly transforming the United States of America into a socialist state by hook AND crook. And few Americans have an inkling of just how tyrannical 0's clandestine deceit has become since last November's election significantly diminished his Congressional power.
This would-be dictator now brazenly rules by fiat, through official and unofficial Executive Orders and Secretarial Orders, as if personally feeding the U.S. Constitution -- article by article, amendment by amendment -- into a document shredder. He is a frighteningly dangerous despot-in-the-making who must be stopped!
0 brazenly confessed to a meeting of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus how he recently told Hispanic group La Raza that when it comes to illegal immigration, "There are times where -- until Nancy Pelosi is speaker again -- I'd like to work my way around Congress. ... I wish I had a magic wand and could make this all happen on my own."
Well -- POOF!!! -- that's precisely what he did! Bypassing the U.S. Senate and U.S. House, as well as the U.S. Constitution, he personally proclaimed amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.
At the time, 0 bragged about his underhanded scheme: "We've got laws on the books that have to be upheld. ... How we enforce the laws is also important," he said, slyly alluding to his major change of ordering a halt to immigration law enforcement.
So, Barack, how do you bestow amnesty? Simple. You, as would-be dictator-in-chief, merely order your regime not to initiate deportation proceedings against illegal immigrants. Period.
Thus 0 indeed worked his way around Congress. And -- so far -- nobody is doing anything about it!
Wednesday, September 28
Thursday, March 3
Ask national media traitors: What if Bush did it?
I saw this at www.TeaPartyNation.com and it rings true! In a letter to the national media traitor of your choice, or your local newspaper editor for that matter, ask the following:
If George W. Bush had doubled the national debt -- which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate -- in one year, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had criticized a state law that he admitted he never even read, would you think that he is just an ignorant hot head?
If George W. Bush joined the country of Mexico and sued a state in the United States to force that state to continue to allow illegal immigration, would you question his patriotism and wonder who's side he was on?
If George W. Bush had pronounced the Marine Corps like Marine Corpse would you think him an idiot?
If George W. Bush had put 87,000 workers out of work by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on offshore oil drilling on companies that have one of the best safety records of any industry because one company had an accident would you have agreed?
If George W. Bush had used a forged document as the basis of the moratorium that would render 87,000 American workers unemployed would you support him?
If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a TelePrompTer installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?
If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM stock by 90percent and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?
If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia , would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?
If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had stated that there were 57 states in the United States, would you have said that he is clueless.
If George W. Bush would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him walking out his front door in Texas, would you have thought he was a self-important, conceited, egotistical jerk?
If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?
If George W. Bush had misspelled the word "advice" would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoes as proof of what a dunce he is?
If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he's a hypocrite?
If George W. Bush's administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?
If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?
If George W. Bush had created the position of 32 Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in America, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?
So, please tell me what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in 21 months -- so you'll have two years and two months to come up with an answer.
If after sending this letter you get a coherant reply, please return to "Get It Right!" and post it in a comment. By the way, let the editor know that every statement is factual and directly attributable to Mr. 0. Every bumble is a matter of record and completely verifiable.
If George W. Bush had doubled the national debt -- which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate -- in one year, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had criticized a state law that he admitted he never even read, would you think that he is just an ignorant hot head?
If George W. Bush joined the country of Mexico and sued a state in the United States to force that state to continue to allow illegal immigration, would you question his patriotism and wonder who's side he was on?
If George W. Bush had pronounced the Marine Corps like Marine Corpse would you think him an idiot?
If George W. Bush had put 87,000 workers out of work by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on offshore oil drilling on companies that have one of the best safety records of any industry because one company had an accident would you have agreed?
If George W. Bush had used a forged document as the basis of the moratorium that would render 87,000 American workers unemployed would you support him?
If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a TelePrompTer installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?
If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM stock by 90percent and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?
If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia , would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?
If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had stated that there were 57 states in the United States, would you have said that he is clueless.
If George W. Bush would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him walking out his front door in Texas, would you have thought he was a self-important, conceited, egotistical jerk?
If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to "Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?
If George W. Bush had misspelled the word "advice" would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoes as proof of what a dunce he is?
If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he's a hypocrite?
If George W. Bush's administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?
If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?
If George W. Bush had created the position of 32 Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in America, would you have approved?
If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?
So, please tell me what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in 21 months -- so you'll have two years and two months to come up with an answer.
If after sending this letter you get a coherant reply, please return to "Get It Right!" and post it in a comment. By the way, let the editor know that every statement is factual and directly attributable to Mr. 0. Every bumble is a matter of record and completely verifiable.
Friday, February 25
Obama + Constitution = 0, zero, nothing, nada
Some ask why I call Barack Hussein Obama "Mr. 0" in this blog. First, it's not O, the uppercase of o. It's 0 as in the number that follows 9 on your keyboard.
Which then raises the question: "Why are you calling him 'Mr. Zero?'"
Several reasons. First of all, I just don't like typing (or hearing or speaking or seeing or thinking, etc.) his name. And I've lived long enough to remember America's arch enemy Nikita Kruschev. You know, that bullet-headed meanie who pounded his shoe at the U.N. and promised America "We will bury you!" I wasn't the only one then who didn't like his name, and America pretty much called the Soviet dictator "Mr. K."
And I'd rather use "Mr. 0" than other longer synonyms, like "treasonous tyrant" or "Marxist dictator" or, well, you get the idea.
But the real reason is this: When America finally realizes Mr. 0 isn't constitutionally qualified to be the President of the United States, everything this treasonous tyrant (oops!) committed in the Oval Office will be reduced to zero! And that thought makes me smile.
I look forward to that day. Somehow, though, even if Mr. 0 doesn't produce an authentic forgery of his missing long-form birth certificate, needed for him to be declared a natural born citizen and have the p in president properly capitalized (note that many break style rules and don't capitalize for this very reason), the Dems and their media lackeys will find it in their heart to overlook this premeditated fraud. After all, they'll say, he didn't know of the U.S. Constitution's qualifications, even though his resume says Mr. 0 is a Constitutional scholar. They'll ask us if everything on OUR resumes is truthful, and we'll look sheepish.
And then, after the race card, they'll play their trump card: "To err is human; to forgive, divine." They'll ask all us bitter Bible-huggers to do what's right and turn the other cheek -- and let Mr. 0 ruin the land we love for another four years.
That'll come with a satisfaction guarantee like that of the trashmen in the cartoon stripe "Hi and Lois." Visible in the grime on their filthy truck are the words Dems live by: "Your satisfaction guaranteed -- or double your trash back!"
And I wonder how many of us right-minded Americans will want to wade through the blood and carnage necessary to successfully oust Mr. 0 as the usurper he in truth is.
Which then raises the question: "Why are you calling him 'Mr. Zero?'"
Several reasons. First of all, I just don't like typing (or hearing or speaking or seeing or thinking, etc.) his name. And I've lived long enough to remember America's arch enemy Nikita Kruschev. You know, that bullet-headed meanie who pounded his shoe at the U.N. and promised America "We will bury you!" I wasn't the only one then who didn't like his name, and America pretty much called the Soviet dictator "Mr. K."
And I'd rather use "Mr. 0" than other longer synonyms, like "treasonous tyrant" or "Marxist dictator" or, well, you get the idea.
But the real reason is this: When America finally realizes Mr. 0 isn't constitutionally qualified to be the President of the United States, everything this treasonous tyrant (oops!) committed in the Oval Office will be reduced to zero! And that thought makes me smile.
I look forward to that day. Somehow, though, even if Mr. 0 doesn't produce an authentic forgery of his missing long-form birth certificate, needed for him to be declared a natural born citizen and have the p in president properly capitalized (note that many break style rules and don't capitalize for this very reason), the Dems and their media lackeys will find it in their heart to overlook this premeditated fraud. After all, they'll say, he didn't know of the U.S. Constitution's qualifications, even though his resume says Mr. 0 is a Constitutional scholar. They'll ask us if everything on OUR resumes is truthful, and we'll look sheepish.
And then, after the race card, they'll play their trump card: "To err is human; to forgive, divine." They'll ask all us bitter Bible-huggers to do what's right and turn the other cheek -- and let Mr. 0 ruin the land we love for another four years.
That'll come with a satisfaction guarantee like that of the trashmen in the cartoon stripe "Hi and Lois." Visible in the grime on their filthy truck are the words Dems live by: "Your satisfaction guaranteed -- or double your trash back!"
And I wonder how many of us right-minded Americans will want to wade through the blood and carnage necessary to successfully oust Mr. 0 as the usurper he in truth is.
Thursday, February 24
Brrr and grrr! Global warming caused my flat tire
If it wasn't for the premeditated harm being perpetrated on the U.S., the "sky is falling" crowd would be downright laughable, what with Algore busy blaming global warming for spawning that monstrous snowstorm that recently buried much of America.
Ernest Istook, a former Republican congressman from Oklahoma, poked fun at Al, writing in Politico: “If you lose your job, blame global warming. If your boyfriend bugs out, blame global warming. If your kids set the house on fire, blame global warming. If the cashier gives you the wrong change, blame global warming.”
Then Istook turned serious: “It’s nothing new for Al Gore to claim that global warming (or should we call it global cremation?) is causing cold weather instead of hot. He already admitted that he was wrong to tout ethanol, but did it for political purposes. His latest comments are just as consistent.”
Conservatives in the U.S. House aren't laughing. They decided to do something about it last Thursday, approving an amendment to a government-spending bill that would block funding for the Obama administration’s so-called "czars.” You know, Mr. 0's hand-picked advisers who answer neither to Congress nor the American people, only to the dictator in chief. The amendment specifically targets the “climate czar” by blocking funding for energy and climate change. The move would unfund the czars through the end of the fiscal year.
Said Rep. Steve Scalise, who authored the amendment: "I think this sends a strong signal to the president that we are tired of him running this shadow government, where they have got these czars that are literally circumventing the accountability and scrutiny that goes with Senate confirmation. We are going to save millions of taxpayer dollars, but we are also going to send him a signal that he is going to have to hold his administration accountable to the same transparency that he promised, but has unfortunately failed to deliver," Scalise said.
Not letting his miserable track record with Congress get him down, the plucky Mr. 0 is using his regime's agencies and the Clean Air Act to push through his global warming agenda anyway. In fact, the new year began with new carbon limits, and the Environmental Protection Agency is drawing up regulations that require companies to get permits to release greenhouse gases.
After all, who needs Congress, or the support of the American people for that matter, when you're a tyrannical dictator, right?
By the way, American Enterprise Institute scientist Ken Green recently told Fox Mr. 0's new regulations are "job killers," that "any kind of regulation is a weight on economy." ... "It requires people to comply with the law, which takes work hours and time, which reduces the profitability of firms. Therefore, they grow more slowly, and you create less jobs."
Mr. 0, of course, is pleased: It's a lose-lose situation for capitalism that has communists everywhere applauding him.
The Scalise amendment, which must clear the Dem-controlled Senate, would also prohibit funding for the director of the White House Office of Health Reform; the State Department’s special envoy for climate change; the special adviser for green jobs, enterprise and innovation at the Council on Environmental Quality; the senior adviser to the secretary of the treasury assigned to the Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry and senior counselor for manufacturing policy; the White House director of urban affairs; the special envoy to oversee the closure of Guantanamo Bay; the special master for TARP executive compensation at the Department of the Treasury; and the associate general counsel and chief diversity officer at the Federal Communications Commission.
So you might want to thank Rep. Scalise while urging your U.S. Senators to follow suit. Get their contact info through the U.S. Capital Switchboard at (202) 224-3121.
Ernest Istook, a former Republican congressman from Oklahoma, poked fun at Al, writing in Politico: “If you lose your job, blame global warming. If your boyfriend bugs out, blame global warming. If your kids set the house on fire, blame global warming. If the cashier gives you the wrong change, blame global warming.”
Then Istook turned serious: “It’s nothing new for Al Gore to claim that global warming (or should we call it global cremation?) is causing cold weather instead of hot. He already admitted that he was wrong to tout ethanol, but did it for political purposes. His latest comments are just as consistent.”
Conservatives in the U.S. House aren't laughing. They decided to do something about it last Thursday, approving an amendment to a government-spending bill that would block funding for the Obama administration’s so-called "czars.” You know, Mr. 0's hand-picked advisers who answer neither to Congress nor the American people, only to the dictator in chief. The amendment specifically targets the “climate czar” by blocking funding for energy and climate change. The move would unfund the czars through the end of the fiscal year.
Said Rep. Steve Scalise, who authored the amendment: "I think this sends a strong signal to the president that we are tired of him running this shadow government, where they have got these czars that are literally circumventing the accountability and scrutiny that goes with Senate confirmation. We are going to save millions of taxpayer dollars, but we are also going to send him a signal that he is going to have to hold his administration accountable to the same transparency that he promised, but has unfortunately failed to deliver," Scalise said.
Not letting his miserable track record with Congress get him down, the plucky Mr. 0 is using his regime's agencies and the Clean Air Act to push through his global warming agenda anyway. In fact, the new year began with new carbon limits, and the Environmental Protection Agency is drawing up regulations that require companies to get permits to release greenhouse gases.
After all, who needs Congress, or the support of the American people for that matter, when you're a tyrannical dictator, right?
By the way, American Enterprise Institute scientist Ken Green recently told Fox Mr. 0's new regulations are "job killers," that "any kind of regulation is a weight on economy." ... "It requires people to comply with the law, which takes work hours and time, which reduces the profitability of firms. Therefore, they grow more slowly, and you create less jobs."
Mr. 0, of course, is pleased: It's a lose-lose situation for capitalism that has communists everywhere applauding him.
The Scalise amendment, which must clear the Dem-controlled Senate, would also prohibit funding for the director of the White House Office of Health Reform; the State Department’s special envoy for climate change; the special adviser for green jobs, enterprise and innovation at the Council on Environmental Quality; the senior adviser to the secretary of the treasury assigned to the Presidential Task Force on the Auto Industry and senior counselor for manufacturing policy; the White House director of urban affairs; the special envoy to oversee the closure of Guantanamo Bay; the special master for TARP executive compensation at the Department of the Treasury; and the associate general counsel and chief diversity officer at the Federal Communications Commission.
So you might want to thank Rep. Scalise while urging your U.S. Senators to follow suit. Get their contact info through the U.S. Capital Switchboard at (202) 224-3121.
Tuesday, February 22
Astonishing number of citizens not buying 0's story
"Politico's" spin on a recent poll brings to mind that old joke about how Soviet mouthpiece "Pravda" reported a two-man footrace: "Russian 2nd, American next to last"?
Straight up, the new poll shows only three in 10 Republicans believe Barack Hussein Obama was born in the United States! That's astounding, considering the media blackout on the issue. But blatantly biased "Politico" reported it this way: "A 51 percent majority of national GOP primary voters erroneously think President Obama was not born in the U.S.; 28 percent know that he was."
Of course, "Politico" had no choice. It would just be too alarming to Dems to honestly report that Public Policy Polling, a left-leaning firm at that, found only 28 percent of Republicans surveyed believe Obama was born in the U.S., while 51 percent do not and another 21 percent say they aren't sure.
You see, the donkeys just knew the "birther" issue would have dried up and blown away by now.
MSNBC "Hardball" host Chris Matthews is among those perplexed by the stunning poll that underscores the growing tide of those questioning Mr. 0's eligibility to rightly continue to serve as President. Especially after Mr. 0 spent more than $1.6 million on hiding all of his records from we the people.
But isn't it hard to believe their surprise is real, not feined? After all, one poll after another since Mr. 0 took office have shown Americans are increasingly skeptical over the supposed story of his birth. In fact, a World Net Daily/Wenzel poll last May revealed 55 percent of Americans -- not just Republicans -- wanted him to release all records relating to his childhood and his education, including "college records, Harvard Law School papers, passport records, travel records, and other similar documentation."
If shocked today, Dems should have gone off like sklyrockets over the fact that, when asked last May what should be done if Mr. 0 is found to be constitutionally unqualified to be President, the poll revealed "59 percent said he should be removed from office, and 35 percent said all bills signed into law by Obama should be repealed. Those numbers have only mushroomed since then.
So spin it or ignore it all they want, this latest poll proves Mr. 0's stonewalling by refusing to answer questions or release ordinary background documentation -- let alone his extraordinary legal maneuvering to keep his background hidden -- is daily eroding America's confidence in him being constitutionally qualified to continue to serve as President. Think of it: Every other President's personal records are open to the public. That Mr. 0 refused to honor his oath of office to defend and uphold the U.S. Constitution is a dead giveaway.
The Constitution requires a President to be a "natural-born citizen," which is not the same as a "citizen." And Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies rightly warns: "Simply put, this question about Obama's legitimacy as president is undermining everything he does in the minds of millions of Americans."
As Dean Debnam, president of the pro-Dem PPP firm put it: "Any thought that the birther theory has been put to rest can be thrown out the window."
Straight up, the new poll shows only three in 10 Republicans believe Barack Hussein Obama was born in the United States! That's astounding, considering the media blackout on the issue. But blatantly biased "Politico" reported it this way: "A 51 percent majority of national GOP primary voters erroneously think President Obama was not born in the U.S.; 28 percent know that he was."
Of course, "Politico" had no choice. It would just be too alarming to Dems to honestly report that Public Policy Polling, a left-leaning firm at that, found only 28 percent of Republicans surveyed believe Obama was born in the U.S., while 51 percent do not and another 21 percent say they aren't sure.
You see, the donkeys just knew the "birther" issue would have dried up and blown away by now.
MSNBC "Hardball" host Chris Matthews is among those perplexed by the stunning poll that underscores the growing tide of those questioning Mr. 0's eligibility to rightly continue to serve as President. Especially after Mr. 0 spent more than $1.6 million on hiding all of his records from we the people.
But isn't it hard to believe their surprise is real, not feined? After all, one poll after another since Mr. 0 took office have shown Americans are increasingly skeptical over the supposed story of his birth. In fact, a World Net Daily/Wenzel poll last May revealed 55 percent of Americans -- not just Republicans -- wanted him to release all records relating to his childhood and his education, including "college records, Harvard Law School papers, passport records, travel records, and other similar documentation."
If shocked today, Dems should have gone off like sklyrockets over the fact that, when asked last May what should be done if Mr. 0 is found to be constitutionally unqualified to be President, the poll revealed "59 percent said he should be removed from office, and 35 percent said all bills signed into law by Obama should be repealed. Those numbers have only mushroomed since then.
So spin it or ignore it all they want, this latest poll proves Mr. 0's stonewalling by refusing to answer questions or release ordinary background documentation -- let alone his extraordinary legal maneuvering to keep his background hidden -- is daily eroding America's confidence in him being constitutionally qualified to continue to serve as President. Think of it: Every other President's personal records are open to the public. That Mr. 0 refused to honor his oath of office to defend and uphold the U.S. Constitution is a dead giveaway.
The Constitution requires a President to be a "natural-born citizen," which is not the same as a "citizen." And Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies rightly warns: "Simply put, this question about Obama's legitimacy as president is undermining everything he does in the minds of millions of Americans."
As Dean Debnam, president of the pro-Dem PPP firm put it: "Any thought that the birther theory has been put to rest can be thrown out the window."
Monday, February 21
"McCarthyism" to fight home-grown killers
Al-Qaida now is actively recruiting home-grown killers within United States borders! That's the extremely ominous warning from Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King, who has set hearings in the U.S. House on the radicalization of American Muslims.
Because of increased security, it's "extremely difficult for them to attack us from outside," Rep. King said. So al-Qaida has switched to recruiting within U.S. borders! "They're taking people who are under the radar screen, who are not on any terrorist surveillance list at all, and they are recruiting them to fight against America," he said.
So how do you suppose they're going about it? Would they approach infidels -- such as Christians or Jews or even atheist liberals -- or seek out Muslims? Would al-Qaida buttonhole people on the street or, say, mosey up in a mosque?
Certainly mosques, where America's Muslims worship and socialize, would be a happy hunting ground.
And the most promising mosque? Why, the one about to be built at Ground Zero in New York City, so that its shadow daily will fall across the site of Islam's triumphant 9/11 strike. Yes, the one that's still scheduled despite the overwhelming objections of the American people. Maybe that's why our protests and petitions are being ignored, huh?
Mr. 0 naturally has been slow to acknowledge the urgency of the terror threat and take a hard line, Rep. King said, noting "it's sort of a schizophrenic administration."
"Schizophrenic." Rep. King said it; not me! Like in some government officials being against terrorism; others, pro?
Rep. King chided Mr. 0 for not being firm enough about the violent protests in Iran. "With Egypt, he was quick to pull the rug on President Hosni Mubarak," he said. "Yet with Iran, when the Iranians were so brutal to the demonstrators, putting down those demonstrations in 2009, the president was virtually silent."
What's more, a new Pentagon-funded study confirms al-Qaida is using the Internet, including Facebook and YouTube, to recruit potential new members right there in their U.S. homes. Poster boy for the home-grown terrorist theory, of course, is Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, an American-born Muslim who killed 13 in a 2009 shooting spree at Fort Hood.
As you might expect, Islamic leaders quickly expressed deep concern that King's hearings will be a witch hunt reminiscent of those by anti-communist crusader Sen. Joe McCarthy in the 1950s. And The New York Times (who else?) criticized the plan.
By the way, thanks to Sen. McCarthy, a massive communist infiltration of our government and society was exposed, narrowly averting a takeover. Bitter that the coup was foiled, sympathizers long have vilified the senator so that his name has become a dirty word -- "McCarthyism" -- to be invoked any time bad guys need to stop Congress from getting to the bottom of some treasonous plot. Like now. But recently released KGB records show the communist ploy was about to work, fully exonerating Joe. You can Google it up. Like the words rainbow and gay, the name McCarthy deserves to be redeemed, but I digress.
Rep. King's Homeland Security Committee hearings are legitimate because: "We have to find out who is being radicalized, how are they attempting to do it, how are they recruiting within the Muslim community and whether or not Muslim leaders are cooperating with law enforcement, what Muslim leaders are doing to find out who in their midst is being recruited and who is a potential danger to the United States," he said.
And isn't it alarmingly sad that right-minded Americans must overcome traitorous opposition and turncoat media to schedule such fact-finding hearings in order to expose this obvious threat. But what else would you expect from an administration run by an Islamist sympathizer whose middle name is Hussein?
Because of increased security, it's "extremely difficult for them to attack us from outside," Rep. King said. So al-Qaida has switched to recruiting within U.S. borders! "They're taking people who are under the radar screen, who are not on any terrorist surveillance list at all, and they are recruiting them to fight against America," he said.
So how do you suppose they're going about it? Would they approach infidels -- such as Christians or Jews or even atheist liberals -- or seek out Muslims? Would al-Qaida buttonhole people on the street or, say, mosey up in a mosque?
Certainly mosques, where America's Muslims worship and socialize, would be a happy hunting ground.
And the most promising mosque? Why, the one about to be built at Ground Zero in New York City, so that its shadow daily will fall across the site of Islam's triumphant 9/11 strike. Yes, the one that's still scheduled despite the overwhelming objections of the American people. Maybe that's why our protests and petitions are being ignored, huh?
Mr. 0 naturally has been slow to acknowledge the urgency of the terror threat and take a hard line, Rep. King said, noting "it's sort of a schizophrenic administration."
"Schizophrenic." Rep. King said it; not me! Like in some government officials being against terrorism; others, pro?
Rep. King chided Mr. 0 for not being firm enough about the violent protests in Iran. "With Egypt, he was quick to pull the rug on President Hosni Mubarak," he said. "Yet with Iran, when the Iranians were so brutal to the demonstrators, putting down those demonstrations in 2009, the president was virtually silent."
What's more, a new Pentagon-funded study confirms al-Qaida is using the Internet, including Facebook and YouTube, to recruit potential new members right there in their U.S. homes. Poster boy for the home-grown terrorist theory, of course, is Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, an American-born Muslim who killed 13 in a 2009 shooting spree at Fort Hood.
As you might expect, Islamic leaders quickly expressed deep concern that King's hearings will be a witch hunt reminiscent of those by anti-communist crusader Sen. Joe McCarthy in the 1950s. And The New York Times (who else?) criticized the plan.
By the way, thanks to Sen. McCarthy, a massive communist infiltration of our government and society was exposed, narrowly averting a takeover. Bitter that the coup was foiled, sympathizers long have vilified the senator so that his name has become a dirty word -- "McCarthyism" -- to be invoked any time bad guys need to stop Congress from getting to the bottom of some treasonous plot. Like now. But recently released KGB records show the communist ploy was about to work, fully exonerating Joe. You can Google it up. Like the words rainbow and gay, the name McCarthy deserves to be redeemed, but I digress.
Rep. King's Homeland Security Committee hearings are legitimate because: "We have to find out who is being radicalized, how are they attempting to do it, how are they recruiting within the Muslim community and whether or not Muslim leaders are cooperating with law enforcement, what Muslim leaders are doing to find out who in their midst is being recruited and who is a potential danger to the United States," he said.
And isn't it alarmingly sad that right-minded Americans must overcome traitorous opposition and turncoat media to schedule such fact-finding hearings in order to expose this obvious threat. But what else would you expect from an administration run by an Islamist sympathizer whose middle name is Hussein?
Friday, February 18
Underhanded chicanery has only just begun ...
When ObamaCare first called for end-of-life counseling -- a deceptive leap toward late-life rationing and "death panels" -- the outcry was so fervent that Congress dropped it from the law.
Nevertheless, end-of-life counseling is back in effect! Not by legislation, but because Mr. 0 says so!
That's right: Thumbing his nose at the overwhelming outpouring of opposition by the American people that gave rise to the Tea Party movement, the undocumented resident in the White House quietly ordered Medicare to issue a regulation for end-of-life counseling during participants' annual "wellness" meetings. What's more, Obama calculatingly hid his outrageous move amid the simultaneous release of hundreds of new Medicare rules, obviously hoping nobody would notice.
But he didn't sneak it past this blog! The RightSite.US knows Mr. 0 all too well to fall for his subterfuge!
Conservative congressmen say they are intent on repealing ObamaCare, but it won't matter what happens in the U.S. Senate. The autocrat in the Oval Office, you see, is busy circumventing Congress, as well as "we the people," with the abuse of executive privilege!
And ObamaCare death panels are only the beginning! Brace yourself for an onslaught of underhanded chicanery from the Obama regime, because whatever our tyrannical ruler cannot pass through Congress, his presidential pen and his federal henchmen will high-handedly accomplish!
Too many Americans have been fooled into thinking Mr. 0 will emulate Bill Clinton and move from the left to the center politically after his overwhelming rejection at the polls last November. He won't!
It's encouraging to see conservatives in control of the U.S. House, and that makes it easy to buy into Mr. 0's stated contention that "hand-to-hand combat" looms between conservatives and leftists in Congress.
However, these congressional skirmishes are merely distractions from the real battles that will determine the outcome of Obama's stealthy war against our constitutional republic.
You see, Mr. 0 has a sly plan already at work to negate the efforts of congressional conservatives. Rather than venture his un-American programs before an increasingly uncooperative Congress, this tyrant is quietly forcing his will on you and your family through executive actions and regime policy decisions, as if ruling by the divine right of kings.
Think of it: A leader with such an unethical lack of scruples doesn't need Congress to approve his ultra-liberal agenda. Like Caesar of old, Mr. 0 is imposing his will on America by decree.
Where, you ask, does he derive such dictatorial powers? Simple: Barack Hussein Obama exercises them "by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution of the United States of America"...
... Except that the U.S. Constitution provides no such powers!
Article II of the Constitution delegates to the President only the powers to act as commander-in-chief of the military, to make treaties -- which must be approved by the Senate -- to grant pardons, appoint ambassadors, nominate Supreme Court Justices and, of course, give the State of the Union Address.
That's it. Anything else, by definition, isn't constitutional!
Unfortunately, too many Americans, including members of Congress, don't realize this truth. And unless someone points it out to the voting public, the authoritarian in the White House is going to get away with his unconstitutional subterfuge.
Isn't that someone YOU?
Nevertheless, end-of-life counseling is back in effect! Not by legislation, but because Mr. 0 says so!
That's right: Thumbing his nose at the overwhelming outpouring of opposition by the American people that gave rise to the Tea Party movement, the undocumented resident in the White House quietly ordered Medicare to issue a regulation for end-of-life counseling during participants' annual "wellness" meetings. What's more, Obama calculatingly hid his outrageous move amid the simultaneous release of hundreds of new Medicare rules, obviously hoping nobody would notice.
But he didn't sneak it past this blog! The RightSite.US knows Mr. 0 all too well to fall for his subterfuge!
Conservative congressmen say they are intent on repealing ObamaCare, but it won't matter what happens in the U.S. Senate. The autocrat in the Oval Office, you see, is busy circumventing Congress, as well as "we the people," with the abuse of executive privilege!
And ObamaCare death panels are only the beginning! Brace yourself for an onslaught of underhanded chicanery from the Obama regime, because whatever our tyrannical ruler cannot pass through Congress, his presidential pen and his federal henchmen will high-handedly accomplish!
Too many Americans have been fooled into thinking Mr. 0 will emulate Bill Clinton and move from the left to the center politically after his overwhelming rejection at the polls last November. He won't!
It's encouraging to see conservatives in control of the U.S. House, and that makes it easy to buy into Mr. 0's stated contention that "hand-to-hand combat" looms between conservatives and leftists in Congress.
However, these congressional skirmishes are merely distractions from the real battles that will determine the outcome of Obama's stealthy war against our constitutional republic.
You see, Mr. 0 has a sly plan already at work to negate the efforts of congressional conservatives. Rather than venture his un-American programs before an increasingly uncooperative Congress, this tyrant is quietly forcing his will on you and your family through executive actions and regime policy decisions, as if ruling by the divine right of kings.
Think of it: A leader with such an unethical lack of scruples doesn't need Congress to approve his ultra-liberal agenda. Like Caesar of old, Mr. 0 is imposing his will on America by decree.
Where, you ask, does he derive such dictatorial powers? Simple: Barack Hussein Obama exercises them "by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution of the United States of America"...
... Except that the U.S. Constitution provides no such powers!
Article II of the Constitution delegates to the President only the powers to act as commander-in-chief of the military, to make treaties -- which must be approved by the Senate -- to grant pardons, appoint ambassadors, nominate Supreme Court Justices and, of course, give the State of the Union Address.
That's it. Anything else, by definition, isn't constitutional!
Unfortunately, too many Americans, including members of Congress, don't realize this truth. And unless someone points it out to the voting public, the authoritarian in the White House is going to get away with his unconstitutional subterfuge.
Isn't that someone YOU?
Thursday, February 17
Don't get fooled again by Mr. 0's subterfuge!
Before Mr. 0 hoodwinked the electorate, he either "fooled" election officials by claiming to be a natural-born citizen or bribed them to just accept his word! As a result, instead of the verification of a constitutionally qualified President calling the shots as Commander in Chief, we have an undocumented resident in our White House.
Fool me once, the old adage goes, shame on you. Fool me twice, however, shame on me -- because it's imperative we learn from our mistakes and not allow history to repeat itself!
Too bad, many say, that it's too late to do anything about Mr. 0. Except that it's not too late, especially if he wants a second term. You see, for the privilege to seek four more years to destroy America with his Marxist agenda, he should finally have to prove he indeed is eligible according to the Constitution's qualifications. And that's the intent of legislation put forth in the U.S. House of Representatives by Congressman Bill Posey.
This bill absolutely must pass, so please support Rep. Posey's vital effort that merely demands the Constitution's eligibility clause be enforced! Because if Mr. 0 fails to produce his long-form birth certificate, its absence will call into question the legitimacy of every piece of legislation and executive order he signed since initially taking office as "President."
Think of it: although Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution demands a candidate for President be a "natural-born citizen," nobody -- not Congress, not the states, not election officials -- bothered to check Mr. Obama's eligibility ...
... Except for Tim Adams. After serving as a Senior Elections Clerk in Honolulu, Adams knows for a fact there is no record of Barack Hussein Obama being born at any hospital in Hawaii. Adams is so insistent that he recently signed a sworn affidavit stating Obama's long-form birth certificate does not exist!
In fact, even now Hawaii's Democrat Governor, Neil Abercrombie, confesses he cannot locate a long-term birth certificate and thus prove Obama is a natural-born citizen!
A telltale analysis by the Congressional Research Service, an arm of Congress, proves the necessity of Rep. Posey's bill. The analysis openly admits no one in the federal government ever asked to see Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate. Why, you might ask? Because, according to the service, no one was required to do so.
Stop the buck passing! End the blame game! Call, write and email your Senators and Member of Congress, using the contact information available through the Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121. Alert family and friends, too. Tell them not to be fooled again!
Fool me once, the old adage goes, shame on you. Fool me twice, however, shame on me -- because it's imperative we learn from our mistakes and not allow history to repeat itself!
Too bad, many say, that it's too late to do anything about Mr. 0. Except that it's not too late, especially if he wants a second term. You see, for the privilege to seek four more years to destroy America with his Marxist agenda, he should finally have to prove he indeed is eligible according to the Constitution's qualifications. And that's the intent of legislation put forth in the U.S. House of Representatives by Congressman Bill Posey.
This bill absolutely must pass, so please support Rep. Posey's vital effort that merely demands the Constitution's eligibility clause be enforced! Because if Mr. 0 fails to produce his long-form birth certificate, its absence will call into question the legitimacy of every piece of legislation and executive order he signed since initially taking office as "President."
Think of it: although Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution demands a candidate for President be a "natural-born citizen," nobody -- not Congress, not the states, not election officials -- bothered to check Mr. Obama's eligibility ...
... Except for Tim Adams. After serving as a Senior Elections Clerk in Honolulu, Adams knows for a fact there is no record of Barack Hussein Obama being born at any hospital in Hawaii. Adams is so insistent that he recently signed a sworn affidavit stating Obama's long-form birth certificate does not exist!
In fact, even now Hawaii's Democrat Governor, Neil Abercrombie, confesses he cannot locate a long-term birth certificate and thus prove Obama is a natural-born citizen!
A telltale analysis by the Congressional Research Service, an arm of Congress, proves the necessity of Rep. Posey's bill. The analysis openly admits no one in the federal government ever asked to see Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate. Why, you might ask? Because, according to the service, no one was required to do so.
Stop the buck passing! End the blame game! Call, write and email your Senators and Member of Congress, using the contact information available through the Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121. Alert family and friends, too. Tell them not to be fooled again!
Wednesday, February 16
Fitting definition of "nanny state" ...
Happy with the state of things in America? Thomas Jefferson pegged it from the start: "I predict future happiness for Americans," the founding father said, "if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them."
That "if" is a mighty big word, friends. Boldface and underline it!
I, for one, am unhappy because in recent years we the people haven't been very successful in preventing our government from "taking care" of us. Remember what Ronald Reagan said: "The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
Well, those now in control of our government want to help us out, whether we need it or not, by taking care of us in every way they can concoct -- and too many Americans gladly are letting them do just that.
Something must be done, hypocritical power-hungry liberals say, urging kneejerk action before proper analysis. And their answer? It's always the same: More and more government, dolling out or otherwise wasting more and more of your tax dollars.
Our once-great nation thus is rapidly becoming a "nanny state." And Rep. Michele Bachmann pointed out a fitting definition Tuesday.
The tea-party backed conservative, who nursed all five of her children, took issue with First Lady Michelle Obama for wanting the government to buy breast pumps so mothers can breastfeed their children and help avoid childhood obesity. "You want to talk about the nanny state," Rep. Bachmann said on The Laura Ingraham Show, "I think you just got a new definition."
Yes, Mr. Jefferson was right about the pursuit of happiness, not to mention life and liberty. I think he also was on target when he said: "That government is best which governs the least, because its people discipline themselves."
That "if" is a mighty big word, friends. Boldface and underline it!
I, for one, am unhappy because in recent years we the people haven't been very successful in preventing our government from "taking care" of us. Remember what Ronald Reagan said: "The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
Well, those now in control of our government want to help us out, whether we need it or not, by taking care of us in every way they can concoct -- and too many Americans gladly are letting them do just that.
Something must be done, hypocritical power-hungry liberals say, urging kneejerk action before proper analysis. And their answer? It's always the same: More and more government, dolling out or otherwise wasting more and more of your tax dollars.
Our once-great nation thus is rapidly becoming a "nanny state." And Rep. Michele Bachmann pointed out a fitting definition Tuesday.
The tea-party backed conservative, who nursed all five of her children, took issue with First Lady Michelle Obama for wanting the government to buy breast pumps so mothers can breastfeed their children and help avoid childhood obesity. "You want to talk about the nanny state," Rep. Bachmann said on The Laura Ingraham Show, "I think you just got a new definition."
Yes, Mr. Jefferson was right about the pursuit of happiness, not to mention life and liberty. I think he also was on target when he said: "That government is best which governs the least, because its people discipline themselves."
Tuesday, February 15
100% chance U.S. will suffer WMD attack!
Thought for today as Mr. 0 continues to coddle terrorists in the politically correct name of freedom of religion: According to an FBI expert, the probability is 100 percent that the United States will be attacked with a "weapon of mass destruction" -- either chemical, biological or radioactive -- by a proponent of the "religion of peace." This comes on the heels of Monday's warning of an electromagnetic pulse attack, raised by none other than former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who insists: "We ought to be willing to say there are radical Islamists who are out to damage the nation state, to kill innocent human beings, and we ought not to allow them to do it."
Some say Mr. 0's middle name is a tipoff that he is an Islamist at heart. To me, what's in a name isn't nearly as important as telltale actions -- like ordering Voice of America to attack Iran's freedom fighters while treasonously backing Tehran's terroristic regime against ally Israel. Or selling out the United States by throwing President Hosni Mubarak under the bus to hand Egypt to the oldest and most evil terrorist group, the Muslim Brotherhood. Or just by cancelling the White House National Day of Prayer and supporting the Islamic celebration of Ramadan, then endorsing the Ground Zero Mosque, the proposed New Yotk City structure that -- in the eyes of the world -- will commemorate Islam's stunning 9-11 triumph over America's might. Or for that matter Mr. 0's "apology tour" at the outset of his regime during which the undocumented resident of the White House bowed the Presidency in submission to Islam ...
... Which by the way is NOT a religion. Mr. 0 knows perfectly well that Islam is a legal, political, economic and military system of government that masquerades as a "religion" in order to first get a foothold. You see, Islamists use the cloak of religion to hide these fascist components from view while demanding and, when strong enough, agitating for Muslims' "religious rights." Trouble is, history shows when politically correct and culturally diverse societies give in to seemingly reasonable Muslim demands to have their religious rights honored, the door to all of the rest unwittingly is thrown wide open.
So make no mistake: Islam is a global political movement bent on world domination. Its goal in America is to abuse our freedom of religion to islamitize the United States -- the last major speed bump keeping Muslims from subjugating all people under sharia law. And with Mr. 0 unconstitutionally in the Oval Office, Muslims around the world enthusiastically are saying: "Yes, we can!"
Some say Mr. 0's middle name is a tipoff that he is an Islamist at heart. To me, what's in a name isn't nearly as important as telltale actions -- like ordering Voice of America to attack Iran's freedom fighters while treasonously backing Tehran's terroristic regime against ally Israel. Or selling out the United States by throwing President Hosni Mubarak under the bus to hand Egypt to the oldest and most evil terrorist group, the Muslim Brotherhood. Or just by cancelling the White House National Day of Prayer and supporting the Islamic celebration of Ramadan, then endorsing the Ground Zero Mosque, the proposed New Yotk City structure that -- in the eyes of the world -- will commemorate Islam's stunning 9-11 triumph over America's might. Or for that matter Mr. 0's "apology tour" at the outset of his regime during which the undocumented resident of the White House bowed the Presidency in submission to Islam ...
... Which by the way is NOT a religion. Mr. 0 knows perfectly well that Islam is a legal, political, economic and military system of government that masquerades as a "religion" in order to first get a foothold. You see, Islamists use the cloak of religion to hide these fascist components from view while demanding and, when strong enough, agitating for Muslims' "religious rights." Trouble is, history shows when politically correct and culturally diverse societies give in to seemingly reasonable Muslim demands to have their religious rights honored, the door to all of the rest unwittingly is thrown wide open.
So make no mistake: Islam is a global political movement bent on world domination. Its goal in America is to abuse our freedom of religion to islamitize the United States -- the last major speed bump keeping Muslims from subjugating all people under sharia law. And with Mr. 0 unconstitutionally in the Oval Office, Muslims around the world enthusiastically are saying: "Yes, we can!"
Back in action ...
Having survived medical crises, I'm dusting off this blog! God apparently isn't through with me, so I'm going to do my best to pass along what my job unearths. Perhaps my smartphone will help me keep it current.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
