So how exactly do we "get it right"?

Thursday, October 30

Remember, Biden gave us fair warning ...

Of course America’s enemies will generate a crisis to test the mettle of our new President, regardless of who wins the Oval Office. Count on it -- they usually do. And while the world learns our leader’s character, it goes without saying that Americans will stand by our Commander in Chief through such a perilous time.

So it’s not surprising that Sen. Joe Biden, Barack Obama’s VP running mate, would issue such a warning. What chilled my heart is the fact Joe then cautioned that Obama’s actions will appear to be wrong.

Just what does the “anointed one” plan to do that Americans would see as wrong? It must seem so wrong that Obama lacks confidence in his slick oratory to convince us with the needed solutuion, so wrong that we must trust him blindly.

And remember: Biden issued his warning surrounded by supporters who worship Obama. To that anti-war crowd, it'd be something like a preemptive strike on Iran's nuclear capabilities. I seriously doubt that, yet the question of "why" remains.

Is B. Hussein's mind already made up not to respond militarily to a terrorist strike against us? Will he refuse to help Israel when attacked by Iran? Does he intend to subjugate the U.S. under U.N. rule?

One thing's sure: Biden definitely had something on his mind, a specific planned response by Obama that many Americans will openly question, even oppose. I know he's called "Gaff-a-Day Joe" for good reason, but --again-- why would Biden close his warning with a call to back Barack's solution against better judgement?

Naturally Obama and Biden have sorted through potential threats. They’ve lined it out: If this happens, we do that; but if that happens, we do this. And there’s one thing Obama plans to do that’s going to upset the public.

My guess? Obama will invoke special presidential powers that declare him a dictator during the crisis. In the name of expediency he will set aside the U.S. Constitution to demand legislation from Democrat-dominated Congress in order to answer the challenge -- subterfuge neatly designed to quickly change us from a constitutional republic for our own good. Trust him -- he knows better than we, the people, do.

Far fetched, you say? Perhaps. Then again I never thought I’d hear a poll-leading presidential candidate talk about the Marxist redistribution of wealth and re-stocking the U.S. Supreme Court to do away with the Constitution. (See videos below)

No comments: